Picture Pincher

Partly to help my right arm heal, and partly to avoid burnout, I am learning to work differently with my photos – especially my self-portraits. Not that I won’t still occasionally go all-out, but I need to avoid the belief that I must go through so much rigmarole each time to shoot them, and that if I don’t have an entire day to devote to makeup and set-up and costume construction then I shouldn’t bother, which is where my head gets stuck if I let it. I also need to calm down thinking I need to a) take 500 shots when in reality, I’m maybe going to process 5 to 10 of them; and b) edit shots obsessively at the end of a shoot until my arm is screaming at me and my eyes are swelling shut and I’m producing nothing but crap because I’m so tired. I can choose to work quickly, take fewer photos, and edit just a few throughout the day while taking breaks to do other things in between, and still be perfectly respectful as an artist – at least I hope so. Because I was starting to feel burned out on taking self-portraits when faced with the prospect of a 2-hour set up and makeup time just to get things going.

Still, I worry about getting lazy or that the photos which result from  a more spontaneous and easy approach will suffer from a lack of heart, or will appear sloppy and shoddy. I rely on you, blog readers, to let me know if that starts happening.  Because I put this shoot together today pretty quickly and didn’t sweat my costume much at all, and I’m not sure if it hindered the results or not. So let me know. I decided to set up and take some portraits in the antique room and I decided to go with a rather harsh, makeup-less look on my face and some austere black to be 1800’s-inspired, but wouldn’t require full makeup or costume. And since I made myself take a break between editing each shot, I only have 4 so far that I can share, but here goes:

victorian1_Snapseed

That’s the original shot, edited and tweaked without filters, but since I’m still using up my trial for the RadLab filtering software I downloaded (I still have 8 days left, then I’m totally gonna buy it) I decided to use a few for the final version. What I used here was subtle and basically changed the tone a bit to give it a more vintage feel:

victorian1_final

The outfit was a little lazy, I suppose (can you tell the top is some sort of rayon and the skirt is knit, cause I can), and perhaps the whole photo is, but I like it and I think it works. I used my 50mm lens and the Speedlite as well as two umbrella stands for that shot, as well as the outside light from two windows opposite me in the room. For these next shots, I did a bit more with RadLab than I did with the first one, so I can show some of their progress as I saved some of the steps to share.

victorian2_Snapseed.

I had this idea I’d do some levitation floating above the piano, but the room is so small and oddly shaped that I’m not sure it’s ever going to work (unless we move the piano – not likely). But I did climb up and sit on it for awhile. The above version is simply tweaked and skin-softened; but here’s how it looked once I RadLabbed it:

victorian2_Snapseed_RadLab

One thing about this shoot that really caused problems in this shot: to save time, I decided to try using the StudioFix powder foundation that I mentioned in a recent post works so well on the sun damage on my neck. Remember how I expressed some concern it would be too dry on my skin? Well I was right. Holy cow you could see every pore of my skin in these shots! So I had to do a lot more softening than usual – especially in this shot where the light was so bright on my face. Anyway, as far as RadLab goes, I added color in the shot above to made it more vibrant, as well as adding light, vignetting, and contrast. I decided to utilize Dirty Pictures, too, to add a little texture – so here’s the final version:

victorian2_final

I really love the textures in Dirty Pictures even though I still try to keep them subtle. I also liked how the color worked in this room, especially all the pops of gold. This next one might be my favorite – original shot up first (already run through PS for skin softening and tweaking):

victorian3_Snapseed

I wasn’t using anything but a Speedlite mounted on top of the camera here, and I think it created some nice shadows – the umbrella stands kept showing up in the mirror hanging overhead, so shut them off and moved them. And one thing about framing here you may have noticed – that mirror is actually NOT centered directly over the piano, so it’s off-kilter a little in the shot (it’s centered on the wall, but the piano isn’t directly in the center…it’s weird and probably stupid  but actually not all that noticeable until you’re taking a photo in front of it). I did use RadLab to brighten it up and give the color more oomph:

victorian3_RadLabAnd then I textured it using Dirty Pictures:

victorian3_RadLab_DP You know though, now that I look at this one, I think maybe it’s way too golden…? I was going for a vintage-feel portrait, but this might be too yellow. May have to re-work this one. One more:

victorian4_Snapseed

RadLab has a ton of black and white filters, and a few of them are very antique in feel, so I knew I wanted to take at least one shot and monochrome it – I went with this shot, even though the pose is definitely not vintage:

victorian4_Snapseed_RadLab

Bet then of course I decided to mess with it some more via texture and tone:

victorian4_finalist1

And then I messed with it even more:

victorian4_finalist2

But in the end, I think this last step was too much, and I like the photo directly above it better.

So, I like these shots, but I admit it feels weird knowing I threw this costume and shoot together (at least when compared to my usual standards) and I’m wondering what you all think. Do they come across as lazy, or sloppy, or without “heart”? Because that is certainly not my intention. On the other hand, if they work, that’s good to know, because it means I can continue to save myself time now and again without the end result suffering. No pressure for you to answer of course, it’s just my photographic future hanging in the balance…

14 thoughts on “Picture Pincher

  1. I think you can do whatever pops into your head and still be confident that it is artistry. Like everything else, it is always evolving, changing. The idea is that you can develop one style and explore all its facets, then move on, in an ascending spiral, that takes you back to the concept eventually, but at a higher level. I think all of life is like that, anyway, so why not this? My two centavos worth, anyway. I like the first shot the best and more skin-tone tint.

    • Thanks, I hope so! And yeah, i went way overboard on the gold tones with all of these…I uploaded one to Flickr around midnight, took one look at it, and thought OMG WAY TOO YELLOW! Sadly I think I am going to have to re-do the tint on all of them some time today. That happens with new software anyway, you always go overboard at first,.

      • In some ways, keeping your face, hair and outfit neutral enables you to do all sorts of different processing on fewer pictures. Since the processing is the clever part anyway and I assume less strenuous physically, you can maximize each shot. Which I think you try to do anyway. But a neutral palette allows you more artistic latitude in the processing phase.

  2. Hi Marey,
    I love this look, very extraordinarily beautiful and touching too! So many aspects to this look and these photos. The black and white is a vintage touch, the side view is very regal and with a bit of the Mona Lisa look, the over the shoulder is so innocent! With your beauty and your photography skills, you create masterpieces!
    Of course I still love when you get dolled up with the Victorian look (very Irene Adler!), or the Pink hair or the other looks.
    I am fascinated that you can have so many looks and styles that all look astonishingly beautiful! You have such a natural beauty that everything you do enhances it and sometimes makes it fun (like the pink hair). But there is also an unclutteredness about your photos, they are simple and yet purrfectly set and focus on the subject.
    Thank you!

    • Thank you Denise! You are always too kind. I am pleased with how these came out, too, BUT when I share the re-edits tomorrow I think you’ll agree they’re better without so much yellow.

  3. Mesmerizing !! #1 and #3 (piano). A set for all times. Congrats. That “old” wall really paid off (
    thanks to you of course).

  4. Sorry to be so late with this comment, but have been really busy taking care of my little girl.
    I just knew that wallpaper had a purpose. These are really great pictures and you remind me of some famous actresses, but can’t remember who.
    Wait, I think I’ve have it. Profile is close to Courtney Cox. How’s that for coincidence?

    • When Friends was popular, I was still teaching, and, especially with my last name being Cox, I got asked ALL THE TIME if I was her sister by my students. Doesn’t happen anymore since kids in high school nowadays aren’t as into the show.

      I hope Abby is doing better…?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s